The afternoon on Monday included a pretty hefty section of other technology sharing.

Folklorists rely on technology heavily. For example, in the past a field worker might need to bring--what amounted to--a recording studio into the field for conducting interviews. The advent of digital recorders and laptops reduces the difficulty in transporting these needed tools. Amongst the group were many digital cameras, iPods, digital recorders, and laptops. The direction the field is headed includes embracing new technologies in the service of preserving traditional culture.

The highlights included the UT Arts Council's transition from use of a FileMaker Pro database to Past Perfect for collections management. The Western Folklife Center have been engaged in Podcasting and have released 10 podcasts so far. The ND Arts Council have been creating enhanced CD's. This has led to funding and interesting collaborations and partnerships ranging from Fish and Game to Indian Reservations. The content has become curriculum for classrooms. Artists have used these CDs as an entry point for artists to get into AIE (Arts in Education) programs.

This morning I gave an overview of Web 2.0. It turned into a lively conversation ranging from the technology to ethical issues surrounding the immediacy of the Web 2.0.

I'll post the slides from the presentation later this evening or tomorrow.

Powered by Qumana

This post represents stream of thought as the conversation unfolded. At some point, I may carefully recraft it.

How can folklorists pro-actively communicate what they have to offer in policy making contexts. What kinds of mechanisms and opportunities do folklorists need to make such contributions.

Three broad areas we looked at this morning include:

1. Training
2. Marketing
3. Outreach to other fields.

You must be prepared to take advantage of opportunities that out there.

There is a personality in the field of "subversiveness".